GNR Publication

Menu
Multidisciplinary Subjects

GLOBAL CLIMATE GOVERNANCE AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES: THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS IN FACILITATING COOPERATION

🗓️ October 4, 2026 📚 The Multidisciplinary Review Vol. 1 Issue 3
Professor Manasseh E. Bassey 1✉,Inyang, Aniedi Ene1
1 Department of Political Science, University of Uyo, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State
đź“„ Download PDFđź”— View Zenodo DOI

Abstract

Climate change had emerged as a global governance challenge that required coordinated responses among states and international organizations. This study examined the role and effectiveness of international organizations in addressing climate change, with emphasis on climate financing, policy coordination, technical assistance, capacity building, mitigation, adaptation and international cooperation. The study adopted a descriptive research design and relied on secondary data obtained through documentary review. Data were drawn from peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, international agreements, policy documents, institutional reports, climate assessments and publications on climate governance. Purposively selected documents were analyzed using thematic and qualitative content analysis, with evidence coded, categorized and synthesized according to the research questions. Institutional theory was adopted as theoretical framework.The findings revealed that international organizations had made contributions to climate action through the mobilization and allocation of climate finance, coordination of climate policies and commitments, provision of technical assistance, capacity building, mitigation and adaptation support, technology and knowledge cooperation, and facilitation of climate negotiations. However, their contributions had been constrained by institutional fragmentation, inadequate and difficult-to-access climate finance, divergent national interests, weak administrative and technical capacity, poor inter-institutional coordination, gaps between international commitments and domestic implementation, technology and knowledge deficits, and the economic and institutional vulnerabilities of developing countries, particularly African states. The study further found that international climate programmes and agreements did not necessarily constitute effectiveness; rather, effectiveness was reflected in measurable mitigation, adaptation, resilience and implementation outcomes. Accountability, transparency, monitoring and reporting were also identified as essential for assessing progress and strengthening implementation. The study concluded that international organizations had remained central to climate governance, but their effectiveness had depended on translating international commitments, financial resources, technical knowledge and institutional mechanisms into sustained climate action. The study recommended stronger institutional coordination, improved accessibility and targeting of climate finance, sustained capacity building, appropriate technology and knowledge transfer, and stronger accountability and monitoring mechanisms, particularly in developing countries and Africa.
Keywords: Climate change, global climate governance, international organizations, climate financing, international cooperation, mitigation, adaptation, developing countries, Africa.

References

  1. Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51, 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9314-8
  2. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14
  3. Biermann, F., & Kim, R. E. (2020). Architectures of Earth system governance. In F. Biermann & R. E. Kim (Eds.), Architectures of Earth system governance: Institutional complexity and structural transformation. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Buchner, B., Naran, B., Padmanabhi, R., Stout, S., Strinati, C., Wignarajah, D., Miao, G., Connolly, J., & Marini, N. (2023). Global landscape of climate finance 2023. Climate Policy Initiative.
  5. Chan, G., Stavins, R., & Ji, Z. (2018). International climate change policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10, 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023321
  6. Dimitrov, R., Hovi, J., Sprinz, D. F., Sælen, H., & Underdal, A. (2019). Institutional and environmental effectiveness: Will the Paris Agreement work? WIREs Climate Change, 10(4), e583. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.583
  7. Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., den Elzen, M., Forsell, N., Höhne, N., Luna, L., Hans, F., Sterl, S. H., Olivier, J., van Soest, H., Frank, S., & Gusti, M. (2021). A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110602
  8. Garschagen, M., & Doshi, D. (2022). Does funds-based adaptation finance reach the most vulnerable countries? Global Environmental Change, 73, 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102450
  9. Green Climate Fund. (2023). GCF: Catalysing finance for climate solutions. Green Climate Fund.
  10. Helm, C., & Sprinz, D. (2000). Measuring the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(5), 630–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002700044005004
  11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022a). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022b). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
  14. Khan, M., Mfitumukiza, D., & Huq, S. (2020). Capacity building for implementation of nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, 20(4), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1675577
  15. Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6, 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
  16. Kuyper, J. W., Schroeder, H., & Linnér, B.-O. (2018). The evolution of the UNFCCC. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030119
  17. Mitchell, R. B. (2008). Evaluating the performance of environmental institutions: What to evaluate and how to evaluate it? In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 79–114). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262240574.003.0003
  18. Okereke, C., & Coventry, P. (2016). Climate justice and the international regime: Before, during, and after Paris. WIREs Climate Change, 7(6), 834–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.419
  19. Pandey, N., de Coninck, H., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries. WIREs Energy and Environment, 11(2), e422. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.422
  20. Stoll, P. P., Pauw, W. P., Tohme, F., & GrĂĽning, C. (2021). Mobilizing private adaptation finance: Lessons learned from the Green Climate Fund. Climatic Change, 167, 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03190-1
  21. United Nations Environment Programme. (2023a). Adaptation gap report 2023: Underfinanced. Underprepared. Inadequate investment and planning on climate adaptation leaves world exposed. United Nations Environment Programme. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/43796
  22. United Nations Environment Programme. (2023b). Emissions gap report 2023: Broken record—Temperatures hit new highs, yet world fails to cut emissions (again). United Nations Environment Programme.
  23. United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Emissions gap report 2024: No more hot air … please! With comprehensive action, 1.5°C is still within reach. United Nations Environment Programme.
  24. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations.
  25. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations.
  26. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations.
  27. World Bank. (2024). Finance and prosperity 2024. World Bank.
  28. Young, O. R. (2011). Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19853–19860. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111690108
  29. Zelli, F. (2011). The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. WIREs Climate Change, 2(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.104
© 2026 GNR Publication. Published under the CC BY 4.0 License. Archived in the Internet Archive. ISSN: 3139-6801.
Scroll to Top